![]() ![]() They feel like an Instrument, in a way that no other soft synth I own does. Something I love about all 3 of these plugins is that they're all on one screen. ![]() That functionality would not remain if sequencing were "outsourced" to a raises the important issue of screen real estate. Merely regarding the sequencer, I like having that as an inherent part of Aalto and Kaivo, with other modules modulating it, and vice versa. I know alot use the sequencer, but is it not easier to just use the sequencing/automation facilities already present in every daw (or use a MIDI sequencer VST) (pitch can wander too, but I think thats part of the beast)Īnyway, Id love to see another out n out synth from ML.Īlso perhaps we can skip the sequencer, so we can have a bit more UI real estate for voice control. I find its quite a small zone of usability, perhaps within only an octave. I do agree about Kaivo, I don't use it as much as I thought I would (and no where near as much as Aalto) because its resonance peaks are really hard to contain. I think they said they will allow imports of patches, but they may/will sound different) (u-he are doing this with Zebra 3, they already have said it will not be compatible with Zebra. not limited/shackled to what Aalto does already (so well) A) updated Aalto with more voices but apart from that the same.ī) a completely new instrument, kind of similar to Aalto ,but not Aalto 2, that would not need to be patch compatible i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |